Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Economic Rationalism

A recent notice of motion by Alderman Ivan Dean at a Launceston City Council meeting, to reduce the numbers of aldermen from 12 to 10, was defeated 7 to 3.

The reason given for the motion was to reduce costs to the ratepayer by saving two allowances and on costs. The motive though questionable was debated and Giving Alderman Dean the benefit of the doubt may have been with good intent.

The discussion around the table raised many issues and as stated was eventually defeated. During the debate, mention was made of the saving made by staff cuts in 2006 as having reduce operating costs over the many divisions within council and the benefits passed on to ratepayers, But was there really a saving…….? I was one of the 13 staff made redundant under the then Mayor Ald. Dean, and General Manager Frank Dixon’s directive.

Economic rationalism when applied to the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, had disastrous consequences. Closing service provision literally downgraded the Museum from active in house exhibition provision to a Museum reliant on accessing exhibitions at huge cost to the rate base, the ‘Game On’ exhibition a prime example, a loss of over $300,000.00

Back in the ninety’s the QVMAG had six exhibitions put together by Museum staff and travelling both nationally and internationally, and generating income for the QVMAG, adding to the budget bottom line.

So what resulted from the cuts? Two major service providers to the ongoing viability of the QVMAG were lost, the Preparation and Large Object Conservation departments, both integral to the ongoing success of the Museum, and its ability to generate contrarily significant exhibitions. The brains trust of the Museum followed shortly after with over fifty key curators and allied staff having lost confidence in the QVMAG management at the time, leaving the Museum.

Today our Museum has limited capacity to put together in-house exhibitions to the standard of the ninety’s. This is no reflection on the current Director who is the right man to rejuvenate the QVMAG. The glory days however are far behind, although the collection has great potential for future endeavour the brains trust has left the building.

We now have similar staff numbers to that prior to the staff cuts, and two less departments, necessitating outsourcing for future in-house exhibition generations. The same recruitment became necessary throughout the council in order to meet the operation demands of council, all in the name of economic rationalism.

Friday, July 22, 2011

RESOURCE RECOVERY FOR LAUNCESTON

Given that Council is now considering how it is going to manage waste in the city it is time that I brought the research I have been doing over the past year to other Aldermen's notice. In fact I have been looking at this and related issues for well over a year now. I have also been networking with community members and others in regard to the issue specifically the NRM Sustainability group, the NOTrubbish network, along with various individuals including Tasmainan Sustainable Communities and the My Community networks.

I've been the co-author of two websites related to the issue and click on their titles here to access them – the NOTrubbish and the Sustainability Cooperative. The time has now arrived to be proactive and to begin to work towards realising some of the ideas people have been discussing over the year.

If we are to ever get a really sustainable, relevant and appropriate "resource recovery system" anywhere we need to start to work on the issue locally. It is important that we start to think about our so-called "waste" as a resource and to stop thinking about waste as rubbish.

Alderman Rob Sowards recent notice of motion on a refund for drink containers, is an example of smart thinking, addressing roadside litter where a waste commodity becomes an income stream. We have to change the way we think of waste by considering a name change.

It has been put to me that we must stop calling our tip a “Waste Management Centre.” In many ways it sends the wrong message. When a council spends millions of dollars engineering its waste management infrastructure to ensure its "waste stream" is sent to landfill. In the end it' not a wise thing to do. It is also a very inappropriate way to manage the resources sent to the tip.

All over the world it has been recognised that burying our waste socially and environmentally is delinquent. There are many examples of better understandings of what is needed to change that kind of mindset. Launceston needs to find them and see what fits the local situation and what we can do here and now.

We might think really hard about changing the name of The Waste Management Centre. We could rename it the Tamar Region Resource Recovery Centre – TRRRC – and start to look for support in the region for resource recovery.

In addition Launceston City Council could embrace the Zero Waste idea ... click here for more information. The downside of this is almost impossible to imagine.

Zero Waste is an idea that encourages communities, companies and households to rethink life cycles of the products they use, and look for ways to see them reused. Rubbish sent to landfill would be minimal. The process is similar to the way that resources are reused in nature. Think about it, it's a no brainer really. In industry it involves the making of new products out of rubbish or what we used to think about as rubbish.

I believe that what Launceston needs is a community cooperative that plays a major role in the region, region recovering the resources that are currently thought about as rubbish. A draft pupose for such a cooperative has been drafted and I endorse the idea.

The draft purpose is:

"The proposed Community Enterprise Sustainable Living Cooperative, will be an independent standalone community not-for-profit enterprise, that fosters and facilitates discrete community initiatives, devised to have sustainable outcomes as well as advocating and promoting sustainable community development, focused upon sustainable living projects."

The aim is to motivate and influence people all across the community to become involved in
"creating sustainable communities but engage with the sustainability concept". There are many ways of engendering a sense of community within our municipality, amongst them, community gardens and men's sheds, topics for a future notices of motion.

For more information about the network's vision click on the links below:
1. The Cooperative's Draft Purpose
2. Draft Objectives
3. Draft Guiding Principles
4. Draft Tactics and Strategies
NB: There are many reference links on this site